<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Letting teaching and research feed each other</title>
	<atom:link href="http://castingoutnines.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/letting-teaching-and-research-feed-each-other/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://castingoutnines.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/letting-teaching-and-research-feed-each-other/</link>
	<description>education &#124; teaching &#124; math &#124; technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://castingoutnines.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/letting-teaching-and-research-feed-each-other/#comment-16274</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castingoutnines.wordpress.com/?p=1278#comment-16274</guid>
		<description>@John: You&#039;re right, and what students find interesting is not only that professors have to deal with rejections, but that for us, the only thing more disappointing than negative feedback is a rejection with no feedback at all. I was a PI on a grant my college recently submitted to a funding agency and we were turned down -- with no indication of what the issues were or why we were rejected. How are we supposed to get funding for this thing, or submit a better proposal next year? Students tend to gloss over professors&#039; feedback, and they are a little surprised to learn that feedback is valuable, positive or negative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John: You&#8217;re right, and what students find interesting is not only that professors have to deal with rejections, but that for us, the only thing more disappointing than negative feedback is a rejection with no feedback at all. I was a PI on a grant my college recently submitted to a funding agency and we were turned down &#8212; with no indication of what the issues were or why we were rejected. How are we supposed to get funding for this thing, or submit a better proposal next year? Students tend to gloss over professors&#8217; feedback, and they are a little surprised to learn that feedback is valuable, positive or negative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Murray</title>
		<link>http://castingoutnines.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/letting-teaching-and-research-feed-each-other/#comment-16273</link>
		<dc:creator>John Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castingoutnines.wordpress.com/?p=1278#comment-16273</guid>
		<description>I have a five course load, but would like to note an important part of an active research agenda: REJECTIONS!  Whether from granting agencies, journals, book publishers, doesn&#039;t matter.  I can tell my students--especially in the writing-intensive class--to learn from bad grades, just as I learn from rejections.  It seems to help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a five course load, but would like to note an important part of an active research agenda: REJECTIONS!  Whether from granting agencies, journals, book publishers, doesn&#8217;t matter.  I can tell my students&#8211;especially in the writing-intensive class&#8211;to learn from bad grades, just as I learn from rejections.  It seems to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
