Some time ago, I posted a very skeletal outline of a new Statement of Teaching Philosophy and got some good feedback. After struggling to write something that doesn’t sound like it came straight out of a Miss America pageant, I ended up throwing out the whole thing and starting over. After locking myself in my basement (my preferred location for really serious thinking and writing) for two hours, I had a totally new version of the document which I actually was sort of happy with. Only problem: It was four pages long in 10-point font. A few minutes ago, I finished a two-day editing process which got it down, barely, to two pages.

I’m hoping that you people out there can be kind again and read, review, and comment on this statement. The plain text version of the statement is “below the fold”. You can download a PDF of it here. Thanks in advance.

Robert N. Talbert, Ph.D.

Statement of Teaching Philosophy

My vocation to education has two inextricably linked parts: to learn, with increasing depth in my subject area and with increasing breadth across the whole spectrum of intellectual life; and to teach, leading students into a life in which they think and learn on their own with disciplined creativity and with a taste for the pleasure of asking and answering important questions about the world. Mirroring this dual nature, my philosophy of teaching is rooted in my conceptions about how people learn. Through a diverse collection of teaching experiences throughout my life — not only as a professor but also as a tutor to middle school kids with ADD/ADHD, a literacy tutor to adults recovering from brain injuries, and as a dad to my preschool-aged daughters — I can point to six basic observations about how people learn which shape my teaching today.

1. People learn because they have questions. Real learning of a subject does not begin until the student has taken enough interest in the subject to form an honest, significant question which renders the subject worthy of attention. Sometimes these questions are practical, sometimes purely aesthetic or asked out of mere curiosity. But learning does not begin unless, and until, those questions are formed in the minds of the student.

How does this translate into teaching? My classes ground themselves in reasonable, interesting questions for which we need the mathematics under study to answer. For example, on the first day of a calculus class, I give an example of two related quantities, such as the price of oil and the price of a gallon of gas. Then I ask: How can we make this relationship precise? How fast is the price of gas changing? By how much can I expect the price of gas to change over a given period? These are questions of interest to the everyday consumer, but they are also questions which motivate the main ideas of calculus (the function, derivative, and integral), and students see why we need these topics.

2. People learn by interacting with the world around them. No learning takes place by mere observation. Learning takes place when students work out the particulars of the concepts they are seeing. This is true no less in mathematics than it is in the humanities, the arts, or athletics. Each concept must be made concrete through individual effort in order to internalize it and ask the right questions about it.

How does this conception translate into teaching? Active learning, especially involving computer technology, is a core element of my teaching. For example, students in my Quantitative Reasoning course go house-shopping online using a real estate web site to gather data which they then use to calculate mortgage payments. Students in my Topics in Geometry course use dynamic geometry software to investigate constructions and formulate conjectures which they then prove. Students in my Differential Equations class use computer algebra systems and spreadsheets to find analytic, numerical, and graphical solutions to dynamical systems in finance and biology.

3. People learn best when they are taught how to learn. If a student is taught only content, learning takes place no faster than the rate at which the professor teaches. But if a student is taught not only content but process — the methodology by which new knowledge is generated in a subject — then the student can learn on his or her own; and the more he or she knows, the faster he or she will add to the knowledge base. Lifelong learning begins with learning how to learn on one’s own in this way.

How does this conception translate into teaching? Effective problem-solving a central goal of each of my courses. I designed and teach a course for sophomore mathematics students called Methods of Problem Solving in which Georg Polya’s four-stage problem-solving heuristic is employed in a variety of settings. I include a “mini-Polya” course in other courses, especially at and below the level of calculus, where students often struggle with solving problems. Assignments in these courses include problem sets which require structured problem-solving and clear exposition of reasoning.

4. People learn best when they are challenged. The goal of an education is not merely the accumulation of content knowledge but the creation of a lifelong learner. A student cannot become a such a learner if his or her academic work is unchallenging and the expectations are low. All students deserve to be given work that “stretches” them and to have high standards set for them. Otherwise there is no learning and no growth taking place, only a gradual settling into a lifelong, suboptimal level of skill.

How does this conception translate into teaching? I model the assessments in my courses using Bloom’s Taxonomy, a standard six-tiered framework of cognitive tasks. Some assessments focus on tasks in the lower three tiers (understand, remember, and apply). Others focus on the upper three tiers (analyze, evaluate, and create). For example, calculus students are given problem sets which require not just calculating derivatives but calculating the same derivative in multiple ways using a model that they have created with a spreadsheet, comparing the results, interpreting the meaning of the results in context, and deciding which derivative calculation is the most realistic. Also, each of my upper-level courses has a significant creative project built in; for example, Modern Algebra students created an online solutions wiki which contained the proofs for their exercises, and Cryptology students created a web site on cryptography during World War II.

5. People learn as much outside the classroom as they do inside. The life of learning truly takes hold in a person’s life when learning becomes de-institutionalized and seen as part of the fabric of everyday life. The learning experience for students should include numerous, inviting venues for learning outside the classroom. Every moment and location should be seen as a time and a place for learning.

How does this conception translate into teaching? I am almost constantly thinking about mathematics, teaching, and learning. Through my blog Casting Out Nines (https://castingoutnines.wordpress.com) and through microblogging platforms such as Twitter (http://twitter.com/roberttalbert), I carry on “back-channel” discussions on a broad range of subjects which include not only students but also professionals and interested readers from all over the world. I have helped develop numerous off-campus and after-hours opportunities for students to interact with mathematics and technical professionals, for example through shadowing programs with professionals in jobs that use mathematics. On a different level, I like to let my personal life be visible and accessible to students — through sharing stories about my kids or making food for evening classes — to let students know that becoming a lifelong learner and mathematician need not come at the expense of a fruitful personal life.

6. People enjoy learning things. When a person sets out to answer a question he or she believes is difficult and important, and when through hard work and perseverance that person arrives at an answer and a host of related questions, it feels good. When we learn, we have accessed that which makes us truly human: the ability to combine our thoughts and memories together with what we learn from the world around us to create something new.

How does this conception translate into teaching? In the end, my level of enthusiasm makes or breaks the learning experience for students. I am genuinely enthusiastic about learning and about mathematics, and I believe I have a responsibility to model a life of the mind that takes genuine pleasure in learning things and shares that pleasure shamelessly with my students. I try to transmit that pleasure and enthusiasm in each class meeting.

Since teaching and learning are inseparable, another key element in my teaching is my scholarship, which has lines of activity in mathematics and in teaching. I have included my scholarship about cryptography, for example, in my Modern Algebra course and the interdisciplinary course on “Cryptography, Privacy, and Leadership” which I designed. I have shared my work in Web 2.0 technology with pre-service mathematics teachers and used it to develop online group course projects. Making my scholarship accessible to students is another instance of de-institutionalizing learning in order to enflame the students’ curiosity. (More details about my scholarship can be found in my Statement of Scholarship.)

You put a lot of work into that.

I will read again more closely later, but first reaction? It covers a lot of ground, nicely. And it doesn’t fall into the list of platitudes that this sort of statement could easily become.

Again, I want to read closer. But I like it so far.

(and I think I read and was unimpressed by your previous attempt)

Jonathan

@jonathan: I wasn’t too impressed with my previous attempt either. Like I said, I thought it came out very “Miss America”. It’s surprisingly hard to write one of these things in a way that isn’t shameless self-promotion combined with eduspeak buzzword bingo.

Thank you for this post.

Patently, you’re missing graphs. Taking the diversity snarks w.r.t. Kurlander.blogspot.com (e.g. hooking the A.P. photo, annotating: Yes, yes, teaching as ADHD, no. No. Maybe as a resource instructor…) might be sensible. Further GraphJot things offer defloralizer >cough< for the terms in here like ‘entire spectrum of intellectual life’ (e.g. illustration of 2 bundles around ‘Let us never talk about it again; Fox Exclusive Reportage, Innumeracy in Sex Trades’ ‘Get me a piece of that action; scripted communications and games, software copyright, iPhone distance learning’ and point of homology.)

I mean, I’ll try getting some cannon fodder (ah…’reusable templates’ is so ’90s) out there, since defining good and valuable is a reasonable exercise. My immediate CFO role is to say “isn’t all this a strict liability if a party (student) borks a compliance filing at work; I mean, knowing about it?” “So…how long before we get this wisdom and capability into innovation (sales) bookings which profit -us-? Is that circuit of profit from work still around, and how can we help foster that workmanship given that all the pure-plays are dead?”

Soon, cheap interface AI shipped with ASUS media-disposals will have the intellect of the kid (10yo, 95kg) who came door-to-door by our block, asking “Does you believes youths can do something positive in they lives?” That general a question easily answers No. We want the cool questions and the general answers that aren’t slave to cheering up the drooling robots.

(My immediate response fell down to rejecting scripted obliqueness; hopefully he had already variously had “How refreshing! Why don’t I agree in principle and then reject whatever it is you sell?” “After the failure of Alexander the Great’s Scientific Management of Persia; No,” “Your life gonna be mostly youth? hmm,” “Don’t you like any negative and irrational things?” “Haven’t you finished the positive stuff? Do that and we can talk seriously….”)

I realize the preceding comment is spam, but I wanted to leave it up as a monument to incoherence. Rarely have I seen a spam comment that I actually felt compelled to read all the way through.

Robert,

Before you go any further, I have two overall impressions. It’s still FAR too wordy (not knowing your audience for this statement) AND I think you have not clearly defined your audience for this paper. I’m sorry to sound so critical, but you are losing your reader’s attention (overwhelming your typical reader). You need to FOCUS it. Let me help:

WHO is your audience?

For each of the following audiences, the statement should be written differently. Think of it as a resume. It you were applying for a math job in a corporation, you would write one resume. If you were applying for a math job in a university, you would write a differently-slanted resume.

Is your audience other MATH PROFESSORS, or COLLEGE ADMINISTRATORS?

Then maybe it’s about right. Is your audience STUDENTS? Is your audience PARENTS? I’m guessing this is the case (students and parents).

IF it is indeed for EVERYBODY, I suggest two DIFFERENT papers–a short, to-the-point statement (no more than three main paragraphs covering the three most important points), that follow from a main thesis statement of one sentence or two.

For administrators/other math professors, prepare a statement as above.

I was put in the same position two weeks ago when I had to introduce myself by email to a new assistant I will have this year, but whom I have never met. I was about to send him a very wordy description of all of my goals and objectives, when I realized what I needed was a ONE SENTENCE SUMMARY of my entire teaching philosophy. (I think you need make a one-sentence statement for yourself (two sentences at most), to clarify all your goals into one overall sentence. Yes, you CAN do it! Here’s my example: ” My classroom philosophy is to make learning FUN, and to teach children that we all must respect each other. In addition, I’m there equally to help children with living BETTER LIVES.”)

Now think of the Journalistic style in which a newspaper article is written (different than normal expository writing, but calculated to not lose the reader’s attention). ALL of the essential facts are in the short first sentence or two. Each subsequent paragraph expands on those ideas.

Well, keep these thoughts in the back of your mind, and good luck. After all the point of WRITING a statement like this is to entice your readers to actually READ it, to be PULLED INTO it, and not to have them say, “OK, it’s a bit long, where’s the main point; OK, I’ll put it down and read it later when I have time,” and then that time never arrives.

I’m sorry–I hope I’ve helped you, and not discouraged you.

There’s nothing wrong with your content, but in my opinion, long paragraphs of expository writing are not appropriate for this sort of document, in which readers are going to be trying to skim for “the main points.” If you can entice them with your main points, they will go on to read your more detailed explanations.

Best regards,

Eileen

Dedicated Elementary Teacher Overseas (in the Middle East)

elementaryteacher.wordpress.com

Sorry, my example statement above should have read:

“In addition to teaching the Grade 3 subject matter, my classroom philosophy is to make learning FUN, as well as to teach children that we all must RESPECT each other. I’m there equally to help children solve their interpersonal problems, and lead BETTER LIVES.”

My point is that ANYTHING ELSE I want to talk about (the syllabus, my classroom discipline policy, class discussions, whatever, WILL FIT with the above topic sentence in various SHORT paragraphs below that, yet I have not OVERWHELMED my reader.

Eileen

Dedicated Elementary Teacher Overseas (in the Middle East)

elementaryteacher.wordpress.com

I came for the Polya, I stayed for a rewrite with slight tightening:

My vocation to education has two inseparable parts: to learn, with increasing depth in my subject and breadth across the whole spectrum of intellectual life; and to teach, leading students into a life in which they think and learn on their own with disciplined creativity and a taste for asking and answering important questions. Mirroring this dual nature, my philosophy of teaching is rooted in my conceptions about how people learn. Through my diverse set of teaching experiences — professor, tutor to middle school kids with ADD/ADHD, literacy tutor to adults recovering from brain injuries, and dad to my preschool-age daughters — I can point to six basic observations about learning which shape my teaching.

1. People learn because they have questions. Real learning does not begin until the student has enough interest in a subject to ask an honest question which renders the subject worthy of attention. Sometimes these questions are practical, sometimes purely aesthetic or asked out of mere curiosity. But learning does not begin until a student forms such questions.

How does this translate into teaching? My classes ground themselves in reasonable, interesting questions which need math to answer. For example, on the first day of a calculus class, I give an example of two related quantities, such as the price of oil and the price of a gallon of gas. Then I ask: How can we make this relationship precise? How fast is the price of gas changing? How much can I expect the price of gas to change over a given period? These are questions of interest to the everyday consumer, but they also motivate the main ideas of calculus (the function, derivative, and integral), and students see why we need these topics.

2. People learn by interacting with the world around them. No learning takes place by mere observation. Learning takes place when students work out the particulars of the concepts they are seeing. This is as true in mathematics as in the humanities, arts, or athletics. Each concept must be made concrete through individual effort in order to internalize it.

How does this translate into teaching? Active learning, especially involving computer technology, is a core element of my teaching. For example, students in my Quantitative Reasoning course shop for houses online, using a real estate web site to gather data which they then use to calculate mortgage payments. Students in my Topics in Geometry course use dynamic geometry software to investigate constructions and formulate conjectures which they then prove. Students in my Differential Equations class use computer algebra systems and spreadsheets to find analytic, numerical, and graphical solutions to dynamic systems in finance and biology.

3. People learn best when taught how to learn. If a student is taught only content, learning takes place no faster than the rate at which the professor teaches. But if a student is also taught process — the methodology by which new knowledge is generated in a subject — then the student can learn on his or her own; and the more he or she knows, the faster he or she will add to the knowledge base. Lifelong learning begins with learning how to learn on one’s own.

How does this translate into teaching? Effective problem-solving is a central goal of each of my courses. I designed and teach a course for sophomores called Methods of Problem Solving, in which Georg Polya’s heuristics are employed in various settings. I include a “mini-Polya” course in other courses, especially at and below the level of calculus, where students often struggle with solving problems. Assignments in these courses include problem sets which require structured problem-solving and clear exposition of reasoning.

4. People learn best when challenged. The goal of education is not merely to accumulate knowledge, but to create a lifelong learner. A student cannot become a learner if faced with unchallenging academic work and low expectations. All students deserve work that “stretches” them, and high standards that test them. Otherwise no learning or growth take place, only a gradual settling into a lifelong, suboptimal level of skill.

How does this translate into teaching? I model the assessments in my courses using Bloom’s Taxonomy, a standard six-tiered framework of cognitive tasks. Some assessments focus on tasks in the lower three tiers (understand, remember, and apply), others on the upper three tiers (analyze, evaluate, and create). For example, calculus students are given problems which require not just calculating a derivative, but calculating it in multiple ways using a model that they have created with a spreadsheet, comparing the results, interpreting the meaning of the results in context, and deciding which calculation is the most realistic. Also, each of my upper-level courses has a significant creative project built in; for example, Modern Algebra students created an online solutions wiki containing the proofs for their exercises, and Cryptography students created a web site on crypto during World War II.

5. People learn as much outside the classroom as inside. Learning truly takes hold in a person’s life when it becomes seen as part of the fabric of everyday life. The learning experience for students should include numerous, inviting venues for learning outside the classroom. Every moment and location should be seen as a time and a place for learning.

How does this translate into teaching? I am almost constantly thinking about mathematics, teaching, and learning. Through my blog Casting Out Nines (https://castingoutnines.wordpress.com), and through microblogging platforms such as Twitter (http://twitter.com/roberttalbert), I carry on “back-channel” discussions on many subjects, not only with students but also with professionals and interested readers all over the world. I have helped develop numerous off-campus and after-hours opportunities for students to interact with mathematics and technical professionals, for example through shadowing programs with professionals in jobs that use mathematics. On a different level, I like to let my personal life be visible and accessible to students — through sharing stories about my kids or making food for evening classes — so that students see that becoming a lifelong learner and mathematician need not come at the expense of a fruitful personal life.

6. People enjoy learning. It fees good when a person sets out to answer a question seen as difficult and important, and through hard work and perseverance reaches an answer and a host of related questions. When we learn, we access what makes us truly human: the ability to combine our thoughts and memories, with what we learn from the world around us, to create something new.

How does this translate into teaching? In the end, my level of enthusiasm makes or breaks the learning experience for students. I am genuinely enthusiastic about learning and mathematics, and I believe I have a responsibility to model a life of the mind that takes genuine pleasure in learning things and shares that pleasure shamelessly. I try to transmit that pleasure and enthusiasm in each class meeting.

Since teaching and learning are inseparable, another key element in my teaching is my scholarship, in mathematics and in teaching. For example, I have included my scholarship about cryptography in my Modern Algebra course and an interdisciplinary course on “Cryptography, Privacy, and Leadership” which I designed. I have shared my work in Web 2.0 technology with pre-service mathematics teachers and used it to develop online projects. Making my scholarship accessible to students is another instance of de-institutionalizing learning in order to enflame students’ curiosity. (For more details, see my Statement of Scholarship.)